header_people.jpg

ONCA Cautions Against Partial Summary Judgment

By , December 8, 2017 9:46 am

As I noted in an earlier blog, the Supreme Court in Hryniak v Mauldin, “rewrote the law on summary judgment” and opened the doors to a fast and cost-effective method of obtaining judgment for terminated employees. The courts since specifically recognized that straightforward wrongful dismissal cases are particularly well-suited for summary judgment.

However, in the past two years, the Ontario Court of Appeal has scaled back on thise legal route.  

In 2016, the Court of Appeal in Singh v Concept Plastics Ltd. held that summary judgment was not often appropriate for claims brought under simplified procedure. Specifically, the Court held that Rule 76.04(1) put “significant limitations” on an employer’s ability to prove its case. As I said in 2016, Singh signaled to employment lawyers to think twice about proceeding with summary judgment, especially with claims initiated under simplified procedure.

The Court of Appeal’s approach continued in the recent Butera v Chown, Cairns LLP decision.

In this case, the court overturned an award for partial summary judgment.  The Court repeated its words of caution from Singh, holding that partial judgment can raise the following problems:

  1. Delay. Parties may use the process as a delay tactic, and even where a motion for partial summary judgment is brought in good faith it increases the time to reach a final decision.
  2. Expense. The motion, and related appeals, may be very expensive.
  3. Lost Judicial Resources. Judges are already spending significant time deciding summary judgment motions, and partial summary judgment does not even result in a final decision.
  4. Inconsistent Findings. The record at trial would be more expansive than a partial judgment motion and could result in inconsistent findings between the partial summary judgment and trial.

Motions for summary judgment still provide an expeditious method of handling wrongful dismissal claims. However, the Court of Appeal decisions should give pause to parties in determining whether summary judgment is the best route to follow for their case.

If parties are keen on proceeding with summary judgment, first evaluate whether to bring the claim under the “regular” procedure instead of simplified procedure, if possible. Then, unless an element of the claim can be clearly bifurcated, avoid partial summary judgment.

If you have been terminated and are considering your legal options, you should consult a lawyer or contact us at [email protected] or 647-204-8107 and one of our lawyers would be happy to assist you.

“The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.”

 

 

Panorama Theme by Themocracy